Phanar head officiates service in Stavropegia with almost no parishioners

The head of Phanar, surrounded by representatives of the OCU and state security officers, climbs up the steps to the St. Andrew's church. Photo: facebook.com/oleksandr.drabinko

On August 21, 2021, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople officiated the vespers in St. Andrew's church in Kyiv, practically “free” of parishioners.

A video of the vespers of the head of Phanar was published on the Facebook page “Stavropegia of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Ukraine”.

In addition to Patriarch Bartholomew, the church was attended by “hierarchs” of the OCU, state security officers, journalists and guests. There were practically no ordinary believers of the newly created religious structure in the temple.

One of the Facebook users wrote under the video with the divine service of the head of Phanar: “But there are so many believers there. A dime a thousand. More a dime than a thousand."

Earlier, the UOJ wrote that after his meeting with the VR Chairperson, the head of Phanar was taken out of the Verkhovna Rada through the courtyard.

Read also

Lawyer reports on the results of searches at Vvedensky Monastery

The monastery is operating normally, and all services are being held according to schedule.

UOC hierarch: Law 3894 is part of de-Christianization of society

Metropolitan Clement explained that most people come to church not with questions about the Tomos, but in search of God.

Pope Francis changes his mind about attending Notre-Dame opening in Paris

Pope Francis shared that he has other plans during the reopening of the cathedral after the fire.

Assembly of Orthodox Bishops of the USA condemns Ukrainian anti-church law

In their resolution, the bishops stated that Law 3894 threatens the religious freedom of millions.

Amsterdam: The U.S. did not ban Islam after 9/11 as Ukraine is banning UOC

The lawyer for the UOC stated that Ukraine violates democratic principles with its anti-Church law.

Court rules the seizure of Krasyliv UOC church by OCU supporters was legal

The OCU insisted that the church belongs to them as private property, while the UOC disputes the authenticity of these documents.