Estonian parliament speaker calls EOC MPs' activities in country a mistake
Lauri Hussar. Photo: ERR
Speaker of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament, - Ed.) Lauri Hussar expressed the opinion that Estonia should not have allowed the activities of the Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate on its territory, reports ERR.
“In my opinion, the establishment of the Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate in Estonia and the state's consent to it was a mistake from the very beginning. In fact, we have created two Orthodox churches: one subordinate to Constantinople and the other to Moscow,” Hussar said.
In his opinion, the real estate agreements made with the EOC were not justified.
The speaker of the Riigikogu emphasized that the Russian Orthodox Church openly supports Russian aggression against Ukraine, which, according to him, is unacceptable on the territory of Estonia.
As reported earlier, the Estonian Interior Ministry commented on the decision of the Estonian Orthodox Church to amend its charter and remove the mentioning of the Moscow Patriarchate, saying it is not sufficient.
Read also
Lawyer reports on the results of searches at Vvedensky Monastery
The monastery is operating normally, and all services are being held according to schedule.
UOC hierarch: Law 3894 is part of de-Christianization of society
Metropolitan Clement explained that most people come to church not with questions about the Tomos, but in search of God.
Pope Francis changes his mind about attending Notre-Dame opening in Paris
Pope Francis shared that he has other plans during the reopening of the cathedral after the fire.
Assembly of Orthodox Bishops of the USA condemns Ukrainian anti-church law
In their resolution, the bishops stated that Law 3894 threatens the religious freedom of millions.
Amsterdam: The U.S. did not ban Islam after 9/11 as Ukraine is banning UOC
The lawyer for the UOC stated that Ukraine violates democratic principles with its anti-Church law.
Court rules the seizure of Krasyliv UOC church by OCU supporters was legal
The OCU insisted that the church belongs to them as private property, while the UOC disputes the authenticity of these documents.