Electronic bracelet removed from Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra monk

Archdeacon Pavel, a monk of Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. Photo: t.me/dmytrukartem

On September 3, the court removed the electronic bracelet from Archdeacon Pavel, a monk of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. This was reported by Member of Parliament Artem Dmytruk on his Telegram channel.

"Not long ago, when I posted bail for our father, even a small victory like the removal of the bracelet seemed like a joy. Ahead is the closure of the case, but even now, we can truly rejoice. This is not just joy; it is the triumph of justice. It exists, and it will prevail," the MP wrote.

According to him, the time will come "when those who fabricate hundreds of criminal cases against clergymen will be held accountable before the law."

As reported by UOJ, in February, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) announced that Archdeacon Pavel (Muzyczko), a resident of Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, was under suspicion, claiming that he was involved in "organizing provocations at the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra."

Read also

Lawyer reports on the results of searches at Vvedensky Monastery

The monastery is operating normally, and all services are being held according to schedule.

UOC hierarch: Law 3894 is part of de-Christianization of society

Metropolitan Clement explained that most people come to church not with questions about the Tomos, but in search of God.

Pope Francis changes his mind about attending Notre-Dame opening in Paris

Pope Francis shared that he has other plans during the reopening of the cathedral after the fire.

Assembly of Orthodox Bishops of the USA condemns Ukrainian anti-church law

In their resolution, the bishops stated that Law 3894 threatens the religious freedom of millions.

Amsterdam: The U.S. did not ban Islam after 9/11 as Ukraine is banning UOC

The lawyer for the UOC stated that Ukraine violates democratic principles with its anti-Church law.

Court rules the seizure of Krasyliv UOC church by OCU supporters was legal

The OCU insisted that the church belongs to them as private property, while the UOC disputes the authenticity of these documents.