In Prykarpattia, a woman ordered to pay a fine for criticizing OCU on FB
Facebook. Photo: SCANPIX
The Verkhovyna District Court of Ivano-Frankivsk region has sentenced a woman who allegedly created a "bot" to harass and criticize the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) on the social network Facebook. According to the local publication "Blitz Info", the court found the woman guilty of inciting religious hatred and imposed a fine of 4,250 UAH.
Court materials indicate that she spread critical comments about the OCU on social media. After her posts in March 2023, representatives of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) conducted a "preventive conversation" with her. However, according to the report, she ignored this and continued to post comments against the OCU. As a result, a criminal case was opened against her.
One of the comments that the court considered "critical" was the following: "I cannot bear to see how OCU barbarians harass and beat our believers. I cannot bear to see how they torture our clergy, how the state bans pilgrimages to holy sites. I cannot bear to see how fanatics illegally evict UOC believers from churches."
In the verdict dated August 27, she was found guilty and fined 4,250 UAH. In addition, she must pay 24,382 UAH for court expert examinations.
As the UOJ previously reported, a UOC believer in the Rivne region was fined 3,400 UAH for a post on the Internet.
Read also
Lawyer reports on the results of searches at Vvedensky Monastery
The monastery is operating normally, and all services are being held according to schedule.
UOC hierarch: Law 3894 is part of de-Christianization of society
Metropolitan Clement explained that most people come to church not with questions about the Tomos, but in search of God.
Assembly of Orthodox Bishops of the USA condemns Ukrainian anti-church law
In their resolution, the bishops stated that Law 3894 threatens the religious freedom of millions.
Amsterdam: The U.S. did not ban Islam after 9/11 as Ukraine is banning UOC
The lawyer for the UOC stated that Ukraine violates democratic principles with its anti-Church law.
Court rules the seizure of Krasyliv UOC church by OCU supporters was legal
The OCU insisted that the church belongs to them as private property, while the UOC disputes the authenticity of these documents.
Metropolitan Clement explains why UOC did not participate in DESS expertise
The UOC hierarch emphasized that the Church's opinion was not adequately considered by the examination of its charter.