Sumy court revokes dismissal of case against Metropolitan Yevlogiy

Metropolitan Yevlogiy in court. Photo: Suspilne Sumy

On August 28, 2024, the Sumy Court of Appeals overturned the decision of the Zarichny District Court to close the criminal case against the head of the Sumy Eparchy of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, Metropolitan Yevlogiy, following an appeal by the Sumy Regional Prosecutor's Office.

According to Sumy Today, the Metropolitan is accused of violating citizens' equality based on their religious beliefs (under Part 1 of Article 161 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), allegedly through statements made during sermons criticizing the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU).

It should be noted that the prosecution completed the pre-trial investigation and submitted the indictment to the court. However, the defendant's lawyer filed a motion to dismiss the case, citing alleged violations in the notification deadlines regarding the conclusion of the investigation and the review of the case materials.

On May 10, 2024, the Zarichny District Court of Sumy dismissed the criminal case, but the prosecutor's office filed an appeal, disagreeing with this decision. After reviewing the prosecution's arguments, the Sumy Court of Appeals decided to reopen the case.

A new hearing in the court of first instance has been scheduled with a different panel of judges.

As reported by the UOJ, the charges against Metropolitan Yevlogiy are based on his statement during a sermon about the "non-recognition of apostolic succession in the OCU by the Polish and Albanian Churches".

Read also

Lawyer reports on the results of searches at Vvedensky Monastery

The monastery is operating normally, and all services are being held according to schedule.

UOC hierarch: Law 3894 is part of de-Christianization of society

Metropolitan Clement explained that most people come to church not with questions about the Tomos, but in search of God.

Assembly of Orthodox Bishops of the USA condemns Ukrainian anti-church law

In their resolution, the bishops stated that Law 3894 threatens the religious freedom of millions.

Amsterdam: The U.S. did not ban Islam after 9/11 as Ukraine is banning UOC

The lawyer for the UOC stated that Ukraine violates democratic principles with its anti-Church law.

Court rules the seizure of Krasyliv UOC church by OCU supporters was legal

The OCU insisted that the church belongs to them as private property, while the UOC disputes the authenticity of these documents.

Metropolitan Clement explains why UOC did not participate in DESS expertise

The UOC hierarch emphasized that the Church's opinion was not adequately considered by the examination of its charter.