Cross procession from Ternopil comes to Pochaiv Lavra for celebrations

Believers in the procession are entering the Pochaiv Lavra. August 4, 2024. Photo: a screenshot from the Mir YouTube channel

On August 4, 2024, a procession from the Ternopil Eparchy reached the Holy Dormition Pochaiv Lavra, reports the monastery's Telegram channel.

"In anticipation of the feast day of the Pochaiv Icon of the Mother of God, the pilgrims from Ternopil came to the Lavra to venerate the Most Holy Theotokos along with the monastery brethren, pilgrims, and other processional participants," the message reads.

On August 3, after the Divine Liturgy, the brethren and believers held a procession with the Pochaiv Icon of the Mother of God to the Transfiguration Cathedral. The service was led by the monastery's abbot, Metropolitan Volodymyr.

The icon of the Most Holy Theotokos will be in the Transfiguration Cathedral until August 5 and be returned to the Dormition Cathedral after the festive Liturgy.

As earlier reported, on August 1, the Lavra welcomed Orthodox pilgrims from Volyn.

Read also

Lawyer reports on the results of searches at Vvedensky Monastery

The monastery is operating normally, and all services are being held according to schedule.

UOC hierarch: Law 3894 is part of de-Christianization of society

Metropolitan Clement explained that most people come to church not with questions about the Tomos, but in search of God.

Pope Francis changes his mind about attending Notre-Dame opening in Paris

Pope Francis shared that he has other plans during the reopening of the cathedral after the fire.

Assembly of Orthodox Bishops of the USA condemns Ukrainian anti-church law

In their resolution, the bishops stated that Law 3894 threatens the religious freedom of millions.

Amsterdam: The U.S. did not ban Islam after 9/11 as Ukraine is banning UOC

The lawyer for the UOC stated that Ukraine violates democratic principles with its anti-Church law.

Court rules the seizure of Krasyliv UOC church by OCU supporters was legal

The OCU insisted that the church belongs to them as private property, while the UOC disputes the authenticity of these documents.