Judge during hearing on UOJ journalist's case: "We all feel bad"
Valeriy Stupnitsky in court. Photo: UOJ
During the hearing on July 30, 2024, in the Solomensky District Court regarding the case of UOJ journalist Valeriy Stupnitsky, the journalist's defense attorney filed a motion to recuse the judge due to alleged bias.
The defense attorney justified his motion and took a seat. The judge then asked him, "Are you okay, Mr. Defense Attorney?" After the attorney stood up, the judge continued, "You just sat down and bowed your head; it was unclear to meβ¦". When the defense attorney responded, "I feel downhearted, Your Honor," the judge replied, "We all feel bad" He then added, "If your physical condition is normal, then everything is fine."
The judge stated that the motion for his recusal would be forwarded for review and then adjourned the hearing.
π You can support the defense of Orthodox journalists through the following details:
Card number: 5375 4112 1927 4706
π Link to the bank.
As reported by UOJ, the defense attorney explained why it is inappropriate to charge UOJ journalists with treason.
Read also
Lawyer reports on the results of searches at Vvedensky Monastery
The monastery is operating normally, and all services are being held according to schedule.
UOC hierarch: Law 3894 is part of de-Christianization of society
Metropolitan Clement explained that most people come to church not with questions about the Tomos, but in search of God.
Pope Francis changes his mind about attending Notre-Dame opening in Paris
Pope Francis shared that he has other plans during the reopening of the cathedral after the fire.
Assembly of Orthodox Bishops of the USA condemns Ukrainian anti-church law
In their resolution, the bishops stated that Law 3894 threatens the religious freedom of millions.
Amsterdam: The U.S. did not ban Islam after 9/11 as Ukraine is banning UOC
The lawyer for the UOC stated that Ukraine violates democratic principles with its anti-Church law.
Court rules the seizure of Krasyliv UOC church by OCU supporters was legal
The OCU insisted that the church belongs to them as private property, while the UOC disputes the authenticity of these documents.