Hearings on eviction of Lavra monks postponed due to judge’s recusal
Solomianskyi Court hearing on 1 August 2024. Photo: a screenshot from video t.me/save_Lavra
On 1 August, the Northern Appellate Commercial Court of Kyiv held a hearing on the case of the eviction of monks from the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra (Lower Lavra). According to the Telegram channel 'Fortress Lavra', the hearing was postponed.
The monastery's lawyers filed a motion for the judge's recusal.
"The monastery's defenders filed this motion based on doubts about the impartiality of Judge Krapivna. The fact is that she has already participated in hearings on Lavra cases, in which she ruled against the monks," the message states.
The panel of judges denied the lawyers' motion, but the judge recused herself.
Due to this, the court hearing on the eviction of the monastery's brethren from the Lower Lavra was postponed. The reassignment of judges is expected.
As reported by the UOJ, the hearing had also been previously postponed due to the judge's recusal.
Read also
Lawyer reports on the results of searches at Vvedensky Monastery
The monastery is operating normally, and all services are being held according to schedule.
UOC hierarch: Law 3894 is part of de-Christianization of society
Metropolitan Clement explained that most people come to church not with questions about the Tomos, but in search of God.
Pope Francis changes his mind about attending Notre-Dame opening in Paris
Pope Francis shared that he has other plans during the reopening of the cathedral after the fire.
Assembly of Orthodox Bishops of the USA condemns Ukrainian anti-church law
In their resolution, the bishops stated that Law 3894 threatens the religious freedom of millions.
Amsterdam: The U.S. did not ban Islam after 9/11 as Ukraine is banning UOC
The lawyer for the UOC stated that Ukraine violates democratic principles with its anti-Church law.
Court rules the seizure of Krasyliv UOC church by OCU supporters was legal
The OCU insisted that the church belongs to them as private property, while the UOC disputes the authenticity of these documents.