VRU Speaker: No break in the Rada, working on law 8371

Photo: Ruslan Stefanchuk. Source: UNN

The Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Ruslan Stefanchuk, announced that after the blocking of the rostrum, the MPs are not going on vacation but will work in committees. He wrote this on his Facebook page.

Stefanchuk reminded that working in the session hall is not the only activity of the MPs of Ukraine: "Each of them works in committees (where laws are prepared for voting in the hall), in temporary special and investigative commissions, engage in other parliamentary control measures, inter-parliamentary activities, and so on," he explained.

The Speaker of the Rada added that the deputies will focus on finalizing certain provisions of law 8371 with the aim of its prompt "submission and voting in the hall. MPs will engage in other activities, including those closely related to the preparation of this bill."

As the UOJ reported, Stefanchuk stated that the Rada will convene when the final version of law 8371 is ready.

Read also

Lawyer reports on the results of searches at Vvedensky Monastery

The monastery is operating normally, and all services are being held according to schedule.

UOC hierarch: Law 3894 is part of de-Christianization of society

Metropolitan Clement explained that most people come to church not with questions about the Tomos, but in search of God.

Pope Francis changes his mind about attending Notre-Dame opening in Paris

Pope Francis shared that he has other plans during the reopening of the cathedral after the fire.

Assembly of Orthodox Bishops of the USA condemns Ukrainian anti-church law

In their resolution, the bishops stated that Law 3894 threatens the religious freedom of millions.

Amsterdam: The U.S. did not ban Islam after 9/11 as Ukraine is banning UOC

The lawyer for the UOC stated that Ukraine violates democratic principles with its anti-Church law.

Court rules the seizure of Krasyliv UOC church by OCU supporters was legal

The OCU insisted that the church belongs to them as private property, while the UOC disputes the authenticity of these documents.