Human rights defenders report violations of UOC believers’ rights in the UN
The 45th session of the UNHRC is being held in Geneva. Photo: protiktor.com
During the 45th regular session of the UNHRC, which is held in Geneva from September 14 to October 7, 2020, representatives of the NGO "Public Advocacy" reported the violations of UOC believers’ rights, according to the website of the NGO "Public Advocacy".
Human rights defenders stated that despite the change of power and some decrease in the intensity of church seizures, violations against the communities and believers of the UOC continue, previously seized churches have not been returned, and those responsible for crimes against the believers have not been brought to justice.
In addition, they cited the law on forced renaming of UOC religious organizations, which remains in force despite national and international criticism.
They also stated that for three consecutive years the Ukrainian authorities had failed to carry out registration actions in relation to the statutes of 13 eparchies and monasteries of the UOC, "as a result of which these religious organizations are effectively deprived of legal personality and cannot dispose of their property, formalize land plots, or exercise other rights.
Human rights activists also pointed to the continuation of inciting religious hatred towards the believers of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, especially in the run-up to the local elections, and an indicative case in this regard is the attacks on the priest of the UOC in Zolochiv, Lviv region, where "the head of the city council assisted in committing offences, and radical organizations publicly destroyed the fence around the priest's house”.
Representatives of the NGO "Public Advocacy" in their statement stressed that the above mentioned and many other problems in Ukraine "have long been of a systemic nature and require not only inclusion in information reports and statements of UN committees and commissions, but also a substantive response, as it was, for example, in the case of eviction of a religious organization of the UOC in Ivano-Frankivsk”.
The human rights organization's website explained that at present "the UN, as well as its agencies and structures, remains the only and non-alternative platform for protecting the rights of victims in cases where the offender is the state”.
"Therefore, in order to protect any target group of victims, it is necessary to constantly promote on the agenda of UN structures, OSCE and other similar organizations both the information on facts of rights violations in this or that area and data on the response of authorities to the protection at the national level. A complex of such actions, often carried out in the long term, can put a situation on the agenda of the UN structures as requiring special attention," the report says.
Earlier Oleg Denisov, head of the NGO “Public Advocacy”, explained that UN decisions are binding.
Read also
OCU chaplain: A soldier should not feel guilty for killing enemies
According to a cleric of the OCU, the word “killing” should not even be used in this context.
AFU servicewoman punished by “being sent to the frontline” for defending UOC
An OCU representative explained how commanders punish UOC believers who defend their Church.
UOC church seized after OCU's and UGCC's provocation at soldier's funeral
Supporters of the UGCC brought the body of a soldier into the church, pressuring a UOC priest to conduct the funeral according to the Greek Catholic rite in an Orthodox church.
UOC hierarch calls on the faithful to pray for the return of seized shrine
Metropolitan Theodosiy urged the faithful to communal and personal prayer to Archangel Michael.
Russian Orthodox Church Primate: Christ did not condemn death penalty
The Patriarch added that, although the Church does not welcome the death penalty, it has never condemned it if this punishment is carried out in accordance with the law.
Metropolitan Jonathan appeals sentence to Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has requested criminal case files from the Vinnytsia City Court for cassation review.