Govorun: Without state pressure, “Unification Council” could hardly happen

Archimandrite Kirill (Govorun). Photo: LB.ua

Without pressure from the state and personally President Petro Poroshenko, the “Unification Council” would hardly have taken place, and Filaret would not have made concessions and compromises. This point of view was expressed by the theologian, professor of the Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, Archimandrite Kirill (Govorun) in an interview with LB.ua.

“The process of state participation in the formation of a new church structure was ambivalent,” said Govorun. “I do not assess right now how correct this is from the point of view of the constitutional norm on the separation of Church and state, although this can also be said. But speaking about the observance of procedures, one thing is clear: without pressure from the state and personally President Poroshenko, the Council would hardly have taken place. And Metropolitan Filaret would not have made concessions and compromises, the most significant of which is the refusal to participate in the election of primate but for the pressure of the state.”

He stressed that the "head" of the OCU was also elected under pressure from the state, but the state showed indifference to the quality of the church life itself, which led to "side effects".

“The pressure had a negative side, a side effect. The interference of the state at that time in the affairs of the Church led to the violation of conciliar procedures. And this makes itself felt not because the state has now stepped aside from church affairs but because the time has come for side effects. They would be inevitable even if Poroshenko had been re-elected for a second term. The reason is the quality of church life, to which the state was indifferent,” the archimandrite explained.

According to him, the presidential administration showed a certain passivity, in connection with which “the representation of the entire Ukrainian Orthodox community in the OCU is significantly narrowed,” which is the main reason for the OCU to remain unrecognized by other Orthodox Churches.

“For Poroshenko’s team, it was important to hold a Council, form a new church structure with a new name and get the Tomos for it. It seemed to them not so important what quality this structure will be of, how widely represented and inclusive,” explained Govorun.

We recall that Archimandrite Kirill (Govorun) was named among the possible candidates for primacy in the OCU. The Presidential Administration did not include the Archimandrite in the lists of participants in the “Unification Council”, although he specifically flew to Kiev from Los Angeles.

Read also

Lawyer reports on the results of searches at Vvedensky Monastery

The monastery is operating normally, and all services are being held according to schedule.

UOC hierarch: Law 3894 is part of de-Christianization of society

Metropolitan Clement explained that most people come to church not with questions about the Tomos, but in search of God.

Pope Francis changes his mind about attending Notre-Dame opening in Paris

Pope Francis shared that he has other plans during the reopening of the cathedral after the fire.

Assembly of Orthodox Bishops of the USA condemns Ukrainian anti-church law

In their resolution, the bishops stated that Law 3894 threatens the religious freedom of millions.

Amsterdam: The U.S. did not ban Islam after 9/11 as Ukraine is banning UOC

The lawyer for the UOC stated that Ukraine violates democratic principles with its anti-Church law.

Court rules the seizure of Krasyliv UOC church by OCU supporters was legal

The OCU insisted that the church belongs to them as private property, while the UOC disputes the authenticity of these documents.