Supreme Court closes the case on legality of Rada’s appeal for Tomos
Верховный Суд Украины
On April 25, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ukraine considered the case and concluded that it had no administrative jurisdiction. This is stated on the Supreme Court's Facebook page.
"The Supreme Court closed the proceedings on the case of religious organizations to repeal the resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of 19.04.2018 No. 2410-VIII "On supporting the appeal of the President of Ukraine to the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew for granting the Tomos of autocephaly of the Orthodox Church in Ukraine" reads the communication.
As the UOJ reported, earlier the Constitutional Court refused to open proceedings on the appeal of 47 deputies about state intervention in the affairs of the Church, considering the case "political". The Constitutional Court stated that they could not assess the legality of the resolution of the Verkhovna Rada, which supported the appeal of President Poroshenko for the Tomos since it has a “political rather than a legal character”.
Read also
Lawyer reports on the results of searches at Vvedensky Monastery
The monastery is operating normally, and all services are being held according to schedule.
UOC hierarch: Law 3894 is part of de-Christianization of society
Metropolitan Clement explained that most people come to church not with questions about the Tomos, but in search of God.
Pope Francis changes his mind about attending Notre-Dame opening in Paris
Pope Francis shared that he has other plans during the reopening of the cathedral after the fire.
Assembly of Orthodox Bishops of the USA condemns Ukrainian anti-church law
In their resolution, the bishops stated that Law 3894 threatens the religious freedom of millions.
Amsterdam: The U.S. did not ban Islam after 9/11 as Ukraine is banning UOC
The lawyer for the UOC stated that Ukraine violates democratic principles with its anti-Church law.
Court rules the seizure of Krasyliv UOC church by OCU supporters was legal
The OCU insisted that the church belongs to them as private property, while the UOC disputes the authenticity of these documents.