CC refuses to open a case on law on religious communities’ subordination
The Constitutional Court of Ukraine
On March 19, 2019, the Constitutional Court adopted a resolution refusing the opening of constitutional proceedings, reports the website of the Court.
“The Grand Chamber of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine at its meeting considered the issue of opening constitutional proceedings in the case on the constitutional submission of 47 people's deputies of Ukraine regarding compliance of the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Certain Laws of Ukraine Regarding the Subordination of Religious Organizations and the Procedure of State Registration of Religious Organizations with the Status of a Legal Entity."
The Grand Chamber of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine adopted the Resolution on refusal to open constitutional proceedings,” the CC said in a statement.
47 deputies headed by Vadim Novinsky and Alexander Dolzhenkov submitted a request on the compliance of the law on the subordination of religious organizations and the procedure for their state registration with the Constitution of Ukraine.
In the submission, deputies referred to Article 35 of the Constitution of Ukraine, which guarantees freedom of religion. They believe that the law contains a number of norms that indicate excessive interference and overregulation of the activities of religious organizations.
In particular, the deputies pointed to the essentially complicated new procedure of registration / re-registration of the statutes of religious communities.
The deputies also saw in the law a violation of Article 36 on the freedom of association of citizens and Article 37, which excludes the prohibition on the activities of associations in an extrajudicial manner.
In addition, the submission claims that the Verkhovna Rada violated the rules when adopting the law, in particular, the vote was not personal.
We recall that that earlier the Constitutional Court refused to open proceedings on the appeal of 47 deputies about state interference in the affairs of the Church, considering the case “political”. The Constitutional Court stated that they could not assess the legality of the resolution of the Verkhovna Rada, which supported the appeal of President Poroshenko about the Tomos since it has a “political rather than a legal nature”.
Read also
OCU chaplain: A soldier should not feel guilty for killing enemies
According to a cleric of the OCU, the word “killing” should not even be used in this context.
AFU servicewoman punished by “being sent to the frontline” for defending UOC
An OCU representative explained how commanders punish UOC believers who defend their Church.
UOC church seized after OCU's and UGCC's provocation at soldier's funeral
Supporters of the UGCC brought the body of a soldier into the church, pressuring a UOC priest to conduct the funeral according to the Greek Catholic rite in an Orthodox church.
UOC hierarch calls on the faithful to pray for the return of seized shrine
Metropolitan Theodosiy urged the faithful to communal and personal prayer to Archangel Michael.
Russian Orthodox Church Primate: Christ did not condemn death penalty
The Patriarch added that, although the Church does not welcome the death penalty, it has never condemned it if this punishment is carried out in accordance with the law.
Metropolitan Jonathan appeals sentence to Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has requested criminal case files from the Vinnytsia City Court for cassation review.